fearlessly proclaiming the truth & the other truth! voice of the teknoshamanic institute
Must Be A Simple Answer
Published on May 30, 2010 By kingbee In Politics

although i haven't posted here for a while, i do occasionally manage to make a little time for myself and drop by long enough to see who's ranting about what.  most recently it was yesterday morning just before being engulfed for the next 12 hours in the tedious labyrinth of winmerging two infinite groups of barely unique files. 

during that ten minutes or so, while enjoying the perfect lunacy that is teabag nation, i noticed someone postulating something about the president as follows:

"...if Obammy is impeached..."

and i've been wondering since what that 'obammy' thing is all about.

here's a link to the discussion in question (visitors be warned: it is a foil hat zone); scroll down to reply#5.


Comments (Page 2)
7 Pages1 2 3 4  Last
on May 31, 2010

considerable complexity

Considerable complexity?

What is complex about terrorism? Is there a justification for attacking children and civilians on purpose?

There is complexity in war and sometimes things are not black and white. But terrorism as a strategy is not a complex issue. It's a war crime, plain and simple.

 

on May 31, 2010

It's not like Obama is doing so much for blacks:

so...that's your answer to my question about the reason obama was being referred to as "obammy"?

it's becoming curiouser & curiouser.

thanks tho.

actually i'm also interested in your take on a proposition frequently put forward on this very site by a small but vocal number of individuals who insist racism no longer exists in contemporary america,  clearly also of the opinion a good offense is the best defense, they respond with statements such as this:  

They are racist themselves. Overcompensating for their own feelings of racism.

seemingly suggesting racism exists only in the eyes of the beholder.

what i'm wondering is if you agree that's also true of anti-semitism?

on May 31, 2010

There is complexity in war and sometimes things are not black and white.

civilians are generally the mass that powers political protest.  it's not at all unusual for large groups of angry demonstrators to damage property and their opponents or for subgroups within the larger movement to literally go commando. 

on May 31, 2010

so...that's your answer to my question about the reason obama was being referred to as "obammy"?

It was more a reply to the point about black presidents and racism.

My point was that a black president is not above ignoring the plight of Africans, i.e. actually oppressed black people.

 

actually i'm also interested in your take on a proposition frequently put forward on this very site by a small but vocal number of individuals who insist racism no longer exists in contemporary america,

I think racism exists in contemporary America, especially among certain right-wing whites and certain left-wing blacks.

In general US society is less racist than most others (a black CEO would be unheard of in Germany) and very much less racist than some societies (the Darfur genocide is not something I could image happening in contemporary America).

I am very worried about individuals like Ron and Rand Paul who have ample support among white supremacists (what do Stormfront know about the Pauls that we don't?) and also about President Obama who seems to think that the key to peace is segregation of Arabs and Jews.

I am also worried about the increasing socially accepted racism among the mainstream left, like talks about Hamas being a legitimate government we have to respect etc..

Anybody who claims that racism no longer exists in contemporary America just needs to take a look at the people many left-wing "peace activists" support in the middle-east:

How is support for that not racism?

(I am assuming we agree that the man in the picture is not a philo-semite talking about the medical qualities of Jewish blood donations who later couldn't explain why he was filmed with so many weapons. Talk about gun nuts...)

 

 

 

 

on May 31, 2010

civilians are generally the mass that powers political protest.  it's not at all unusual for large groups of angry demonstrators to damage property and their opponents or for subgroups within the larger movement to literally go commando.

Yes, not quite the same as firing rockets at schools and hospitals.

The problem is when those "angry demonstrators" decide to be angry at kindergardens and hospitals and start damaging not property but children and women.

If people are upset by police presence and attack them, that's a crime.

But if people are upset by kindergardens and hospitals and attack those, that's terrorism.

Most people (especially on the left) look at what people (claim to) fight for, not what methods they use. They argue that the goal justifies the means. But I think that the means justify the goal.

 

on May 31, 2010

I'll have to go out on a limb and say "obammy" was probbaly a combo of Obama and mommy.

"Mammy", not "mommy."

on May 31, 2010

"Mammy", not "mommy."

I had never heard of the term "Obammy" before.

 

on May 31, 2010

tea is a race?

Tea is a beverage.

 

on May 31, 2010

Tea is a beverage.

Food for thought.

 

on May 31, 2010

from what you've revealed about yourself over the past several years, a whole lotta stuff seems to make perfect sense to you (at least some of which is purely patent nonsense in my opinion and a subset of that is, in fact, utter nonsense no matter who agrees or disagrees with you--but that's a whole other discussion).

Interesting but since this is just your "opinion" (nothing or real value these days) I guess it doesn't really matter now does it?

in this case, however, perhaps you're on to something.

How... man of you? to admit this.

 

on May 31, 2010

can't thank you enough for saving me the trouble of having to express and/or explain my beliefs/opinions especially in regard to matters of considerable complexity such as those you mention.

Glad I could help. Always willing to help the less fortunate and handi-cap. I'm sure such complex issues will be simpler with time, after all they say with age comes wisdom although in your case it's more like a lesson well learned.

what's truly astounding is your accuracy. i'm no statistician but it's gotta be damn near impossible to achieve a 100.0000% error rate.

What's truly astounding is how you can use so many big words and still sound so second grade (literally as well). I guess age and wisdom are not a constant.

on May 31, 2010

Food for thought.

He could use some. Thought that is.

on May 31, 2010

Wow, KB referencing one of my "rants" what an honor

on May 31, 2010

Wow, KB referencing one of my "rants" what an honor

I just got called on a "bad" word!!!

on May 31, 2010

If people are upset by police presence and attack them, that's a crime.


But if people are upset by kindergardens and hospitals and attack those, that's terrorism.

and if people are congregating peacefully in hope of spreading the gospel of "christian identity" while wearing ss uniforms and bearing swastika banners?  no rockets, no kindegartens, no terrorism? 

how bout when they hold their rallies in a community in which a number of holocaust survivors choose to reside?

or a large group of men wearing hooded robes and carrying flaming torches who march through the darkened streets of a minority community without damaging a single kindergarten or hospital with or without rockets?  

 

7 Pages1 2 3 4  Last