I'll have to go out on a limb and say "obammy" was probbaly a combo of Obama and mommy. It's the only thing that makes sense to me.

You are so brave to leave you winmerging labyrinth and enter the "foil hat zone" to bring us this interesting inquiry.

No Charles, he is just doffing his foil hat to spew more stupidity.  Clearly he does not understand multiple syllable words.  He seeks to paint all those people participating in a discussion with the smear of his own bias. 

It is sad to see someone who once may have been an intelligent being, devolving into just another hate spewing idiot that cast aspersions but never backs them up.

A perfect dupe for the democrat party.

There ya go again, calling freedom loving citizens perverts. You racist.

No, he is just stupid.  He does not realize how racist he is, or sounds.

It truly is a shame. He won't even defend his own articles. Not sure why he bothers to take a few minutes of his "busy" life to post such silly articles and not bother to reply to the comments.

It's sad people like him can be so idiotic, ignorant and stupid. In his mind terrorist are just freedom fighters fighting for their rights and beliefs (they are allowed to kill innocent people to reach their goals) but people who happen to be protesting during the time we have a Black President are racist. Kinda interesting how that works.

Busy?  Hardly.  Empty? Yes.

Not really.  They are racist themselves.  Overcompensating for their own feelings of racism.  The one good thing that Obama has shown us is the racist nature of liberals,

Simple, kb.  It's ebonics for Bushitler.

I leave for two days... and look what I miss!!! LOL

Isn't it being a bit of a chicken S**t to post an article commenting on another, without posting a comment there first, yourself? I didn't realize JU had an article reviews section.

It's not like Obama is doing so much for blacks:

http://citizenleauki.joeuser.com/article/381594/First_African_American_president_to_Promote_Injustice_in_African_Country

As the victims and survivors of Darfur genocide, we are not surprised by the results of the Sudanese rigged, flawed elections that have been announced earlier this week, to declare a victory for Omar Al-Bashir, as a re-elected president to Sudan. But we are extremely shocked, and terribly dismayed for the support of some International Community members, especially the US, the UN, the African Union, the Arab League, the Muslim world and some European countries.

...

And guess what?

Who has turned a blind eye to the suffering of Africans in Darfur?

-- A man who claims to be in charge of change, democracy and the civil rights movement and inheritor of Dr. King's legacy.

-- A man of the same African descent, and the first African American president of the United States of America.

-- A man called "OBAMA" who promised to do as good as Mr. King did and claimed:" The United States has a moral obligation anytime you see humanitarian catastrophes.

from what you've revealed about yourself over the past several years, a whole lotta stuff seems to make perfect sense to you (at least some of which is purely patent nonsense in my opinion and a subset of that is, in fact, utter nonsense no matter who agrees or disagrees with you--but that's a whole other discussion). 

in this case, however, perhaps you're on to something.

kettle meet pot.

prove it or admit you're lying again.  since there's no qualification involved it would appear you're asserting i don't understand ANY multiple syllable words.

tea is a race?

can't thank you enough for saving me the trouble of having to express and/or explain my beliefs/opinions especially in regard to matters of considerable complexity such as those you mention. 

what's truly astounding is your accuracy. i'm no statistician but it's gotta be damn near impossible to achieve a 100.0000% error rate. 

ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh   daiwa said "bu-shit-ler!" 

ohhhhhhhhhh  nitro said "s**t!"

other than that, i wasn't posting an article commenting on another; i am asking about a comment made on the thread.  as far as posting on the other article, what's the point?  its author is, in his own humble estimation,  the net's foremost arbiter of fact, perfectly omniscient and--unlike mere popes--absolutely infallible.

thanks to hardworking independent thinking, freely enterprising individuals who refuse to be steamrolled by or knuckle under to those determined to making us all do things "their way", we don' need no steenkeeng reviews section.