fearlessly proclaiming the truth & the other truth! voice of the teknoshamanic institute
Must Be A Simple Answer
Published on May 30, 2010 By kingbee In Politics

although i haven't posted here for a while, i do occasionally manage to make a little time for myself and drop by long enough to see who's ranting about what.  most recently it was yesterday morning just before being engulfed for the next 12 hours in the tedious labyrinth of winmerging two infinite groups of barely unique files. 

during that ten minutes or so, while enjoying the perfect lunacy that is teabag nation, i noticed someone postulating something about the president as follows:

"...if Obammy is impeached..."

and i've been wondering since what that 'obammy' thing is all about.

here's a link to the discussion in question (visitors be warned: it is a foil hat zone); scroll down to reply#5.


Comments (Page 7)
7 PagesFirst 5 6 7 
on Jun 04, 2010

Ever heard of learning from mistakes or are you the kind of person who needs to get burned several times before you stop putting your hand in the fire?

Chuck you know it only confuses the left when you disparage Bush. It take the wind out of their sails when they say "but, but Bush did it". They can't deal with their own hypocrisy.

on Jun 04, 2010

It take the wind out of their sails when they say "but, but Bush did it".

That is the most ironic (hypocritical?).  They vilified Bush for 8 years (going on 10), and now they excuse the current kid with that one!

on Jun 04, 2010

Wrong. I'm just saying you can't compare 8 years with 2 years.

on Jun 04, 2010

Infidel
Wrong. I'm just saying you can't compare 8 years with 2 years.

True, Obama is doing more damage in 2 than Bush did in 8.

on Jun 05, 2010

those sites are so inflammatory that in 2010 it has to be satire, or its someone just trying to make Obama's critics look bad.

if only.

I'll bet there really are lots of bigots and racists on both sides of the isle.

that's a relief huh?

do you really think I'm a racist?

i've no basis for making that sorta determination

you've still not explained why you referred to obama as "obammy,"

on Jun 05, 2010

But good to see you are still a liar, since here are your links from where you made the allegation:

http://niggermania.net/forum/showthread.php?237-Obammy-loves-his-KFC.
http://www.chimpout.com/forum/showthread.php?s=3e7ee69d32dab1028a597ceb20dcd4c5&p=529750#post529750

And which when you blow up your "poof", you can see the links you try to lie with are not the same, in fact one is not even the same site! LIAR. Again, why am I not surprised?

well there ya have it sportsfans.

after all these years and, according to drguy, layers upon layers of deliberate prevarication, non-truths, mis-truths and falsehoods, i've been caught typing red-handed by none other than the net's most brilliant, dedicated and persistent anti-lie crusader and must now admit the following: 

1. in my reply #79, i'd inserted a graphic image purporting to be a screencap of a google page on which i'd claimed to have found two specific links i'd pasted into my reply #69. 

2. said links do point to two separate remote domains as intended neither of which was identified by name. 

3. i modified said google page image, using a highlighted arrow to indicate where each of these two links was located and could be found on the page in question; i also added a third highlighted arrow to indicate the google page number (1).

4. in fact, one of those links indicated on the google page image was not the link i originally posted in my reply #69.

i sincerely apologize for having so egregiously misinformed the public.

having confessed and apologized, i feel obliged to expose one more lie conveniently overlooked by ol dr"honesttogod"guy:

1. referring to his reply#72 he states the links i provided in my reply #69 were located thusly:

Hmm, the 101st or 1001st hits from goolge?

2. in his reply#85 (partially quoted at the top of this post)--he affirmatively repeats his original claim the links i provided were "101st or 1001st" links.

3. both allegations were factually false from the jump; repeating them evidences premeditation compounded by malicious intent

although i didn't attempt to mitigate my own offense, i had no intention to deceive anyone and would not have deliberately weakened my argument had i realized i was pointing a different link than i'd previously posted.  i was in a hurry and perhaps a bit careless. once again, i apologize.

i truly wish i could tell yall my accuser is merely a pompous self-serving asshole but since we're being totally candid and absolutely honest with each other i feel honor-bound to qualify that characterization a bit more accurately in that  he's a lying pompous, self-serving asshole and an unapologetic habitual hypocrite who was proven a flagrantly unrepentant plagiarist by none other than little_whip

on Jun 05, 2010

2. in his reply#85 (partially quoted at the top of this post)--he affirmatively repeats his original claim the links i provided were "101st or 1001st" links.

Liar.  I stated the original claim as a flippant one, not an exact one, and did not repeat it.

I fail to see why you continue to lie when the facts which are easy to check show your lies.  You are pathetic,  At least try to lie so that you will not be caught so easily.  Liar.

3. both allegations were factually false from the jump; repeating them evidences premeditation compounded by malicious intent

Logic 101 would do you good.  Since I never claimed the links you gave were exactly those numbers, and never repeated the claim as you lied about, you continue to lie.  Again, and again and again.  I fail to see the logic in your feeble attempts to lie your way around the fact that you are just plain wrong.  Since you have yet to produce those 2 links in the original post, we do not know if they are 21st, 54th, or 101st, now do we?  So I can say they are anything, and so far, you have yet to prove a thing (other than you lie).  Once you produce documentary evidence of where they fall within the google search, at best you can say I exaggerate.  At worst you will have to admit I was being conservative.  But you will do neither, as you seem to be able to do only one thing.  Lie.

had no intention to deceive anyone

Another lie.

i was in a hurry and perhaps a bit careless. once again, i apologize.

Tell that to the judge.  The evidence is overwhelming since you have been caught in so many before, and yet again.

i truly wish i could tell yall my accuser is merely a pompous self-serving asshole but since we're being totally candid and absolutely honest with each other i feel honor-bound to qualify that characterization a bit more accurately in that he's a lying pompous, self-serving asshole and an unapologetic habitual hypocrite who was proven a flagrantly unrepentant plagiarist by none other than little_whip

No, she never did.  Nor did you.  But you can lie all you want to.  Your credibility is shot, so now you resort to smearing.  I guess you have to do something to lick your wounded pride in being shown to be a liar and fraud again.  Nice try buzz bait.

on Jun 06, 2010

Since you have yet to produce those 2 links in the original post, we do not know if they are 21st, 54th, or 101st, now do we? So I can say they are anything, and so far, you have yet to prove a thing (other than you lie). Once you produce documentary evidence of where they fall within the google search, at best you can say I exaggerate.

apparently i do have problems with words of 2 syllables; not a problem of comprehension though. take the word "moron".  i know what the word defines.  identifying you as a total moron proves i fully grasp the concept and use the term accurately in a sentence.   my problem is an inability to completely ignore your rabid moronic blather. 

from here on, i intend to redouble that effort.

in the mean time, here's an updated screen cap of the very 1st page google returns for the search term "obammy".

same two links only now one of of those i originally provided has moved to the top of the page.

 

on Jun 06, 2010

Kids, kids, settle down.  This is a very unseemly exchange.

on Jun 06, 2010

never repeated the claim

except by needlessly re-quoting your own moronic statement  from my reply (in which it was germane and relevant though no less moronic).

Hmm, the 101st or 1001st hits from goolge? Great research. I am sure you can find anything if you sift through the google hits long enough.

By god, you have struck Searchdirt!
thanks.

I was being conservative

every time you make that assertion, you're causing poor ol bob taft and barry goldwater to commence spinnin in their graves.

on Jun 07, 2010

apparently i do have problems with words of 2 syllables

Indeed as you still act like a moron, speak like a liar, and cant tell truth from fiction.  But go ahead and make your stupid childish insults since you can do no other.  You lie and lie and then try to spin lies into truth.  Even Rumpelstiltskin could not do that.

I have shown everyone your lies, smears, childish rants, and just over all moronic behavior.  You just continue to dig your own hole of shame.  Go right ahead.  No one can stop you.

Liar.

7 PagesFirst 5 6 7