fearlessly proclaiming the truth & the other truth! voice of the teknoshamanic institute
If He Was A Bear, Yogi Wouldn't Have ANY Pic-a-nic Baskets
Published on January 31, 2006 By kingbee In Politics

christina applegate and jennifer tilly are two very smart, sexy, funny women who share a very unique talent.  both are able to conjure up characters who say and do such incredibly stupid things with such finesse, it is sometimes difficult not to confuse christina with kelly bundy or jennifer with damn near a sorority of goofy sounding ditzy bimbos.

brilliant as they may be, they have nothin on george w. bush.  

i may seem gullible and naive but i've done seed da light. 

my epiphany occured yesterday morning during bob schieffer's 'face the nation' interview with the president. 

after querying bush about hamas' unexpected victory in last week's elections, iran's apparent determination to arm itself with nuclear weapons, iraq, hurricane katrina and the lengths to which a president can go during wartime--all of which george bumbled thru in his own inimitable goofy style--schieffer moved on to the current controversy over government eavesdropping.

SCHIEFFER: Let me ask you this, Mr. President because I just have never quite understood this, and maybe you could clear this up. As I understand the law, you had the right to wiretap or eavesdrop on anyone and have three days to tell the court about it. How does that slow you down?

PRESIDENT BUSH: I asked the same question to the people designing the program. I said, how come we can't use the procedures which you just described, and they said it won't work. It doesn't fit in with what Mike Hayden described as "hot pursuit." 

ME: huh?

PRESIDENT BUSH (cont): I have looked at this program from all angles, and my dilemma and my problem is I can't explain to you how it works in order to justify your question without telling the enemy what we are doing.

And this debate is an interesting debate. I'm troubled by it only because the enemy listens, and they see what we are doing, and these are smart people, and they will adjust.

ME: wow!

PRESIDENT BUSH (cont): And one of the interesting questions, Bob, about this whole debate is whether or not people think we are at war or people think this is kind of an isolated group of people that may or may not hit us,

ME: (trying to imagine who coulda forgot we were at war or that al quaeda was a kinda of isolated group who may or may not hit us...and then i realized he must  be referring to the department of homeland security and fema, as well as anyone who hasn't hadda slip outta his or her shoes before boarding an airplane)>

PRESIDENT BUSH (cont): and I'm--perhaps it was because I was a sitting president when 9/11 occurred. Perhaps because I remember my words going to Congress just saying I'm not going to ever forget what took place, and I will use all the power and my authority within the Constitution to protect the American people, but I view this situation we're in as war, and therefore I must protect the American people with the tools available to me.

so i'm sitting there, appropriately shocked and awed, thinking, 'jeez, if only all of us had been sitting presidents when 9/11 occurred, we might not have so easily forgotten what took place...' and very uncharitably wondering if perhaps bush had managed to equal or top his performance during the first debate of 2004..the one in which he kept explaining over and over again how he worked hard...doing hard work...the hard work of working hard. 

then it hit me. 

no matter what scheiffer or anyone else asked him, our president was as many steps ahead of his interviewers as yogi bear was jellystone park's mr ranger.   like more than enuff to make all them pic-a-nic baskets (or, in this case, serious questions) just plain disappear as if they'd never existed (or been asked).   


Comments (Page 2)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Jan 31, 2006
Are you trying to say that all sororities are only bimbos?


Only the sororities worth cruising for dates.


Actually, I believe he's saying that she has portrayed enough "goofy sounding ditzy bimbos" to fill a sorority.

on Jan 31, 2006
See, this is why none of the JU conservatives take the JU liberals seriously.

"Bushtards"? Isn't that kind of derogatory, non-affirming, hate speech exactly the kind of tool The Man uses to oppress people? Shouldn't all you good liberals be practicing tolerance and cultural diversity and whatnot?

Anyway, let me see if I can translate kingbee's story for you:


MONKEY: Why can't you get wiretap warrants?

PANTS: Because of how we're using the wiretaps to catch terrorists.

MONKEY: And how is that?

PANTS: Look, if I tell you that, then the terrorists will know how we're catching them, and they'll take steps, and we won't be able to catch them anymore. And since you probably aren't going to let this go, even though I've already made it clear I can't go into detail, let me change the subject for a few minutes. Hopefully after I bore you for a little bit, you'll be willing to move on.

NINJA: Goddamn, those Pants are clever! Oh, wait! I am teh sarcastic!

PUPPY: Ninja, you're my hero!

PIRATE: You're a tiny party hat for my behind, is what you are.
on Jan 31, 2006
I really wish you people would make up you minds. Are you saying he's stupid or smart?


You people? Hmmm. There's your first misapprehension....

You've created a classification of people in your mind, assigned attributes to that classification, then started fitting people into it, only to be confused when "those people" don't think and act homogeneously.

I think they have name for that... Let's see what is that called...?


I guess a good President is someone who goes on national TV and tell everyone all the plans he has, all the people he's watching and completely forget that most of it is suppose to be secret due to national security because that's not what's important, people really need to know this stuff.


Nah, a good President is one who shows a little more respect for the Constitution he's sworn to uphold and defend. A good President is one who recognizes that America is the principals and rights on which it was founded, and that to trample or violate those principals and rights is to trample and ultimately undo America herself. A good President is one who puts the interest and good of the people above his own interests, beliefs, and welfare and those of his friends, associates, or political party. A good President recognizes that when he assumes that mantle he is no longer his own man, but the President of all the people, all the time.
on Jan 31, 2006
"that's funny right there!"


'it's kinda like usin an irritated short-tailed brown bat as a fishing fly, so i gotta ask: how's that workin for you?'
on Jan 31, 2006
OMG, Jennifer Tilly is so fine she might be worth selling your soul for.


mmmmmmmmhmmmmmmm!

sell my soul? where do i sign?

i'd be willing to go a whole further than that tho. i've recently found myself seriously wishing there was a way i could somehow become henry winkler.

the woman is a danger to everyone around her.
on Jan 31, 2006
Are you trying to say that all sororities are only bimbos?


see comment #16. gene nailed it perfectly.
on Jan 31, 2006
Are you saying he's stupid or smart?


lemme put it this way: failing to beat the spread on all the nfl games on any given regular season sunday requires just as much skill as does correctly acing the spread.
on Jan 31, 2006
But I guess a good President is someone who goes on national TV and tell everyone all the plans he has,


see reply #18. gene's articulation and insight humbles me. not a word i'd dare to change there.
on Jan 31, 2006
stutefish's seems to have mistranslated a few crucial elements. for example:

MONKEY: Why can't you get wiretap warrants?


PANTS: Because of how we're using the wiretaps to catch terrorists


shoulda read...

ENQUIRING MIND: why do you intentionally refuse to comply with wiretap laws despite the wide latitude they provide?

THE GHOST OF PROFESSOR IRWIN COREY: a great man once said 'starve a cold and feed a fever'. experts tell me it just doesn't work that way but if i were to let you know which way was that way, there may be evildoers who'd use such knowledge against us.

i remember reading 'my pet goat' and then going before congress to proclaim it was brillig when the slithy toves did gyre and gimbal in the wabe. i meant it then and i'm even more sure of it today.
on Feb 01, 2006
well he is the Anti-Christ after all so if the Fundamentalist Christian lobby is supporting him then he has them fooled at least. http://www.bushisantichrist.com/
I don't know my Republicans from my Democrats but wasn't it a Republican who said "The President is merely the most important among a large number of public servants. He should be supported or opposed exactly to the degree which is warranted by his good conduct or bad conduct, his efficiency or inefficiency in rendering loyal, able, and disinterested service to the nation as a whole. Therefore it is absolutely necessary that there should be full liberty to tell the truth about his acts, and this means that it is exactly as necessary to blame him when he does wrong as to praise him when he does right.

Any other attitude in an American citizen is both base and servile. To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public. Nothing but the truth should be spoken about him or any one else. But it is even more important to tell the truth, pleasant or unpleasant, about him than about any one else.

- President Theodore Roosevelt, 1912
on Feb 01, 2006
My favorite conservatives criticize the President all the time.

It's not criticism that makes the critic unpatriotic or servile. Tt's criticism which is partisan, rather than principled, that makes the critic unpatriotic or servile.

More accurately, a "servile" critic will support the President even when he is wrong, for partisan reasons. An "unpatriotic" critic will oppose the President even when he is right, for partisan reasons.
on Feb 02, 2006

http://www.bushisantichrist.com

til i read that, i was about 98% convinced rick santorum was the antichrist. 

now i'm sooooo confused.   

on Feb 02, 2006

as a rather outspoken publisher (former boss) used to tell me, 'if you wanna know what's really goin on, all you gotta do is turn it around 180ยบ'.

Only if the properties are communicative.  Obviously they are not in this situation.

on Feb 02, 2006
til i read that, i was about 98% convinced rick santorum was the antichrist.

now i'm sooooo confused.


How can anyone dispute the evidence?




on Feb 03, 2006
You don't become president without the ability to talk at length and in-depth about nothing.
especially when it's incoherent, and you're a damn good fund-raiser. Besides, he learned from the best--Gracie Allen, confusion that wins out.
3 Pages1 2 3