fearlessly proclaiming the truth & the other truth! voice of the teknoshamanic institute
Paranoia Strikes Deep
Published on August 1, 2005 By kingbee In Politics

sixty years ago this saturday--august 6, 1945--the first atomic bomb ever used as a weapon of war exploded about 2000' above the city of hiroshima, japan. 

in an instant, the city was flattened; 80,000 of the estimated 250,000 people located there were killed instantly.  another 60,000 would eventually fall victim to radiation produced by the bomb.

three days later, a similar bomb was exploded over the japanese city of nagasaki.

at the time, the usa was the only nation on earth to construct atomic weaponry.  20 years later, the world was divided into two major geopolitical factions, both of which had much more powerful and sophisticated nuclear devices.  there were also several nations capable and willing to build their own atomic weapons.  45 years later, one of the two factions began crumbling into oblivion.  still other nations were determined to possess nuclear bombs.  60 years later, 9 nations now possess nuclear weapons.

so far, somehow, mankind has managed to avoid using another one  of these weapons.

as more nations--as well as groups of seemingly apocalyptic terrorists--seek to possess them--we come ever closer to the day when the next nuclear device is used to wreak the horror of instant mass destruction somewhere in the world.  we're as likely target as any other people or place.

terrorists--whether domestic or foreign--have demonstrated a penchant for action on dates of historical relevance.

the murrah federal building was bombed on april 19 for example;  april 19 being both  the day our revolution began when  minutemen first attacked colonial britain.  it's also the anniversary of the destruction of the self-styled lamb of god, david koresh and a great many of his followers.  

september 11 marked the 79th anniversary of the british mandate in palestine.

i could be just paranoid...or perhaps i'm reading too much into this, but i can't think of a more auspicious and relevant date than august 6 for al-quaeda or some similar group to try and bring it all back home to us. 


Comments (Page 3)
3 Pages1 2 3 
on Aug 07, 2005
"
considering the way they governed the us, nixon and kissinger had no business ordering the cia to interfere in chile's domestic affairs."


As I said on the other Allende discussion, that I agree with. I don't think we really had any business being involved. What burns my ass is when people try to portray it as some dark US intervention against a unified Chilean people.

In reality a lot of people didn't like Allende. I mean, those were Chileans that deposed him, right? Did we breed programmed clones, or were those US citizens in disguise?
on Aug 08, 2005
I don't think the nationalization of private property against the will of legitimate owners is in line with the spirit of democracy. My opinion, of course.


If you are referring to the copper mines, he nationalized those with the support of the Chilean people and unanimous support in Congress. Of course, my opinion is that democracy and socialism go hand is hand, and increasing worker control of their workplaces is an important aspect of that.
on Aug 08, 2005
Not to bait you with another Hitler analogy, but nationalization and "worker control" DON'T necesarily go hand in hand. Who in the end gets to dole out that control? It was my understanding, though I don't have a link to provide, that part of the copper industry was just handed over to be "managed" by other foreign companies. I wonder if such influence was free?

Allende also didn't just nationalize copper. He undertook the same kind of "resettlement" that we see now in Zimbabwe, where ancestral estates were snatched away from their owners and given to "the people", which enevitably ends up meaning "flunkies". He nationalized banks and all sorts of other industries.

Didn't he also eventually make some sort of decree that allowed him to sieze such without congressional approval? Do you see a pattern? Evidently the people of Chile did, since enough of them were concerned that they successfully changed things. I mean, if I recall, weren't there mass strikes and CALLS for intervention?
3 Pages1 2 3