fearlessly proclaiming the truth & the other truth! voice of the teknoshamanic institute
Published on August 22, 2004 By kingbee In Blogging

the following was published august 21, 2004 in the chicago tribune by a tribune reporter named william rood who happens to be one of the two surviving swift boat commanders (kerry is the other) who saw action at  dong cung on february 28, 1969.  his article (im posting it in it's entirety below) speaks for itself. 

the images ive provided are mr rood's citation for bravery for which he was awarded a bronze star   the after action report on which that citation and award were based  .

ANTI-KERRY VETS NOT THERE THAT DAY

By William B. Rood
Chicago Tribune
Published August 21, 2004

There were three swift boats on the river that day in Vietnam more than 35 years ago—three officers and 15 crew members. Only two of those officers remain to talk about what happened on February 28, 1969.

One is John Kerry, the Democratic presidential candidate who won a Silver Star for what happened on that date. I am the other.

For years, no one asked about those events. But now they are the focus of skirmishing in a presidential election with a group of swift boat veterans and others contending that Kerry didn't deserve the Silver Star for what he did on that day, or the Bronze Star and three Purple Hearts he was awarded for other actions.

Many of us wanted to put it all behind us—the rivers, the ambushes, the killing. Ever since that time, I have refused all requests for interviews about Kerry's service—even those from reporters at the Chicago Tribune, where I work.

But Kerry's critics, armed with stories I know to be untrue, have charged that the accounts of what happened were overblown. The critics have taken pains to say they're not trying to cast doubts on the merit of what others did, but their version of events has splashed doubt on all of us. It's gotten harder and harder for those of us who were there to listen to accounts we know to be untrue, especially when they come from people who were not there.

Even though Kerry's own crew members have backed him, the attacks have continued, and in recent days Kerry has called me and others who were with him in those days, asking that we go public with our accounts.

I can't pretend those calls had no effect on me, but that is not why I am writing this. What matters most to me is that this is hurting crewmen who are not public figures and who deserved to be honored for what they did. My intent is to tell the story here and to never again talk publicly about it.

I was part of the operation that led to Kerry's Silver Star. I have no firsthand knowledge of the events that resulted in his winning the Purple Hearts or the Bronze Star.

But on Feb. 28, 1969, I was officer in charge of PCF-23, one of three swift boats—including Kerry's PCF-94 and Lt. j.g. Donald Droz's PCF-43—that carried Vietnamese regional and Popular Force troops and a Navy demolition team up the Dong Cung, a narrow tributary of the Bay Hap River, to conduct a sweep in the area.

The approach of the noisy 50-foot aluminum boats, each driven by two huge 12-cylinder diesels and loaded down with six crew members, troops and gear, was no secret.

Ambushes were a virtual certainty, and that day was no exception.

Instructions from Kerry

The difference was that Kerry, who had tactical command of that particular operation, had talked to Droz and me beforehand about not responding the way the boats usually did to an ambush.

We agreed that if we were not crippled by the initial volley and had a clear fix on the location of the ambush, we would turn directly into it, focusing the boats' twin .50-caliber machine guns on the attackers and beaching the boats. We told our crews about the plan.

The Viet Cong in the area had come to expect that the heavily loaded boats would lumber on past an ambush, firing at the entrenched attackers, beaching upstream and putting troops ashore to sweep back down on the ambush site. Often, they were long gone by the time the troops got there.

The first time we took fire—the usual rockets and automatic weapons—Kerry ordered a "turn 90" and the three boats roared in on the ambush. It worked. We routed the ambush, killing three of the attackers. The troops, led by an Army adviser, jumped off the boats and began a sweep, which killed another half dozen VC, wounded or captured others and found weapons, blast masks and other supplies used to stage ambushes.

Meanwhile, Kerry ordered our boat to head upstream with his, leaving Droz's boat at the first site.

It happened again, another ambush. And again, Kerry ordered the turn maneuver, and again it worked. As we headed for the riverbank, I remember seeing a loaded B-40 launcher pointed at the boats. It wasn't fired as two men jumped up from their spider holes.

We called Droz's boat up to assist us, and Kerry, followed by one member of his crew, jumped ashore and chased a VC behind a hooch—a thatched hut—maybe 15 yards inland from the ambush site. Some who were there that day recall the man being wounded as he ran. Neither I nor Jerry Leeds, our boat's leading petty officer with whom I've checked my recollection of all these events, recalls that, which is no surprise. Recollections of those who go through experiences like that frequently differ.

With our troops involved in the sweep of the first ambush site, Richard Lamberson, a member of my crew, and I also went ashore to search the area. I was checking out the inside of the hooch when I heard gunfire nearby.

Not long after that, Kerry returned, reporting that he had killed the man he chased behind the hooch. He also had picked up a loaded B-40 rocket launcher, which we took back to our base in An Thoi after the operation.

John O'Neill, author of a highly critical account of Kerry's Vietnam service, describes the man Kerry chased as a "teenager" in a "loincloth." I have no idea how old the gunner Kerry chased that day was, but both Leeds and I recall that he was a grown man, dressed in the kind of garb the VC usually wore.

The man Kerry chased was not the "lone" attacker at that site, as O'Neill suggests. There were others who fled. There was also firing from the tree line well behind the spider holes and at one point, from the opposite riverbank as well. It was not the work of just one attacker.

Our initial reports of the day's action caused an immediate response from our task force headquarters in Cam Ranh Bay.

Congratulatory message

Known over radio circuits by the call sign "Latch," then-Capt. and now retired Rear Adm. Roy Hoffmann, the task force commander, fired off a message congratulating the three swift boats, saying at one point that the tactic of charging the ambushes was a "shining example of completely overwhelming the enemy" and that it "may be the most efficacious method of dealing with small numbers of ambushers."

Hoffmann has become a leading critic of Kerry's and now says that what the boats did on that day demonstrated Kerry's inclination to be impulsive to a fault.

Our decision to use that tactic under the right circumstances was not impulsive but was the result of discussions well beforehand and a mutual agreement of all three boat officers.

It was also well within the aggressive tradition that was embraced by the late Adm. Elmo Zumwalt, then commander of U.S. Naval Forces, Vietnam. Months before that day in February, a fellow boat officer, Michael Bernique, was summoned to Saigon to explain to top Navy commanders why he had made an unauthorized run up the Giang Thanh River, which runs along the Vietnam-Cambodia border. Bernique, who speaks French fluently, had been told by a source in Ha Tien at the mouth of the river that a VC tax collector was operating upstream.

Ignoring the prohibition against it, Bernique and his crew went upstream and routed the VC, pursuing and killing several.

Instead of facing disciplinary action as he had expected, Bernique was given the Silver Star, and Zumwalt ordered other swifts, which had largely patrolled coastal waters, into the rivers.

The decision sent a clear message, underscored repeatedly by Hoffmann's congratulatory messages, that aggressive patrolling was expected and that well-timed, if unconventional, tactics like Bernique's were encouraged.

What we did on Feb. 28, 1969, was well in line with the tone set by our top commanders.

Zumwalt made that clear when he flew down to our base at An Thoi off the southern tip of Vietnam to pin the Silver Star on Kerry and assorted Bronze Stars and commendation medals on the rest of us.

Error in citation

My Bronze Star citation, signed by Zumwalt, praised the charge tactic we used that day, saying the VC were "caught completely off guard."

There's at least one mistake in that citation. It incorrectly identifies the river where the main action occurred, a reminder that such documents were often done in haste and sometimes authored for their signers by staffers. It's a cautionary note for those trying to piece it all together. There's no final authority on something that happened so long ago—not the documents and not even the strained recollections of those of us who were there.

But I know that what some people are saying now is wrong. While they mean to hurt Kerry, what they're saying impugns others who are not in the public eye.

Men like Larry Lee, who was on our bow with an M-60 machine gun as we charged the riverbank, Kenneth Martin, who was in the .50-caliber gun tub atop our boat, and Benjamin Cueva, our engineman, who was at our aft gun mount suppressing the fire from the opposite bank.

Wayne Langhoffer and the other crewmen on Droz's boat went through even worse on April 12, 1969, when they saw Droz killed in a brutal ambush that left PCF-43 an abandoned pile of wreckage on the banks of the Duong Keo River. That was just a few months after the birth of his only child, Tracy.

The survivors of all these events are scattered across the country now.

Jerry Leeds lives in a tiny Kansas town where he built and sold a successful printing business. He owns a beautiful home with a lawn that sweeps to the edge of a small lake, which he also owns. Every year, flights of purple martins return to the stately birdhouses on the tall poles in his back yard.

Cueva, recently retired, has raised three daughters and is beloved by his neighbors for all the years he spent keeping their cars running. Lee is a senior computer programmer in Kentucky, and Lamberson finished a second military career in the Army.

With the debate over that long-ago day in February, they're all living that war another time.


Comments (Page 4)
5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5 
on Aug 25, 2004
home to publicly advocate a position that--at the time--was seen as guaranteeing hed never win an election


BS.

I'm going to agree with Daiwa. Kerry put his political finger to the Mass. wind, got a reading and started punking out the rest of the military. He's used his military experience to play both sides of the fence for political gain since that swift boat. If being anti-Vietnam got him somewhere he was anti-Vietnam. If having been to Vietnam could get him somewhere well by all means let's use that too.

GIve me a break.

next to beer and scoring chicks, the biggest concern amongst 23 year old military dudes is how to convey a presidential image . . .


Wahine, you have no concept of the politically ambitious. I was writing political speeches when I was 13 just for practice.

on Aug 25, 2004

Kerry put his political finger to the Mass. wind, got a reading and started punking out the rest of the military. He's used his military experience to play both sides of the fence for political gain since that swift boat

so youre saying that he volunteered for extremely dangerous duty (once again, having already served a full tour) because?  he felt lucky? 

more than a few gungho volunteers returned disgusted and determined to stop the war, realizing the risk it might entail.  it's only in the past 20 or so years that having been an antiwar activist no longer dooms one to being a political pariah.  kerry's testimony is still seen by some as having been treason.  had the us  been swept by another wave of mccarthyism (and dont discount that possibility because it could happen again even now) anyone daring to speak out against that war would have suffered. 

on Aug 25, 2004
so youre saying that he volunteered for extremely dangerous duty (once again, having already served a full tour) because?  he felt lucky? 


"... started punking out the rest of the military...since the swift boat."

Are you saying he returned to Vietnam after returning to America and becoming an anti-war activist?

more than a few gungho volunteers returned disgusted and determined to stop the war, realizing the risk it might entail.


I don't know how many of them were as politically ambitious as our Mr. Kerry, though.

it's only in the past 20 or so years that having been an antiwar activist no longer dooms one to being a political pariah. 


Yet Mr. Kerry's whole career seems to belie that point. It certainly didn't hurt him, in fact I would say it helped immensely, while it was convenient. Now that he's moved from the safely liberal climes of Massachusetts, though, to where some of his anti-war stunts are far less than okay he is backpedaling. Now he's "proud of his service." Now it's someone else's medals he threw over the fence.

Do think that Kerry's time as VVAW spokesman didn't help him politically? That he didn't use that platform as a launching pad for his political career?
on Aug 25, 2004
This JFK wasn't the first JFK. If you look at how John F Kennedy was elected, his service was made a great deal of. A lot of people think that was what Kerry was talking about when he likened himself to Kennedy and spent a lot of time posing for photographs. Once he got back, do you think he looked at the political climate and saw that touting his heroism there was going to do him any political good?

Nope, so he just flipped and joined the rising "Vietnam is evil" crowd that was, contrary to your points, gaining huge ground in the Democratic party. Now he's back talking about his "band of brothers" in J.F. Kenndy mode again.

on Aug 25, 2004

Are you saying he returned to Vietnam after returning to America and becoming an anti-war activist?

of course not.  what im saying is this:  hed completed his required tour of duty.  why choose a  pfc detail for a 2nd tour if he had plans for anything (seeing as how there was a 1 in 5 chance of returning undamaged? there were other, safer choices that would have offered as much prestige (more perhaps because the swiftboat mission wasnt extensively publicized as well as much better photo-ops?   

punking out the rest of the military

i purposely didnt respond to that the first time around but...id hardly refer to the actions of returned vets who knew firsthand what was going on in vietnam and were determined to stop it as  punking anyone.  the vaseline jar has plenty of fingerprints on it and many of them have already been traced back to the opportunists and idealogues for whom that needless war was a means to acquiring power and wealth thru the perversion of patriotism.  

Do think that Kerry's time as VVAW spokesman didn't help him politically?

considering he ran for office twice in the 70s and lost both times?  no

on Aug 25, 2004

If you look at how John F Kennedy was elected, his service was made a great deal o

as i said previously, during the 50s and 60s, you had to be a veteran to be a viable candidate.  no self-respecting ww2 vet would have supported you otherwise.  and if you were a war hero, it was a big plus. 

the rising "Vietnam is evil" crowd that was, contrary to your points, gaining huge ground in the Democratic party.
 

there was growing opposition to the war in all circles but anti-war activists were political lepers in both parties.  remember the 68 convention in chicago?  how about mcgovern?  what do you think inspired the slogan 'clean for gene'?  

on Aug 25, 2004
I should probably start another article because what I want to say about John Kerry and the VVAW ins't really appropriate for this one.
on Aug 25, 2004
Gene: Hmmm . . . did your preteen political speeches include the words "boobies", "rad", or "my parents suck"?
on Aug 25, 2004
Hmmm . . . did your preteen political speeches include the words "boobies", "rad", or "my parents suck"?


No.
on Aug 25, 2004
Gene: I'm sure you were very serious and politically proactive when you were 13 . . . I'm sorry I made light of your political ambition . . . how truly ignorant of me . . .
on Aug 25, 2004
King, I quit.

It's clear my "No More Mr. Funny Ha Ha" campaign should have went beyond my blogs and extended to my comments as well.

Sorry to stink up your thread. I'm retiring.
on Aug 25, 2004
kingbee: I see Kerry's trail through politics as stance/shift/stance/shift. When it serves him, he is a ex-protester. When it serves him he is a war hero. He wasn't JUST a protester, he was a decorated war hero, too.

People like Ira Einhorn were being courted by the Democratic party as advisors throughout the 1970's. Think about it in terms of a timeline.

He got a BA in Political Science from Yale University in 1966. Off to the war, which ended up being something vastly different than Kennedy's war, so he fudged as much as possible to get 3 purple hearts and got the heck out of Dodge. He won the Democratic nomination for Representitive in 1972, but lost the election. He then went to law school. By 1976 he was a prosecutor in the Middlesex County district attorney's office, by 1983 he was Lieutenant Governor of Mass., and by 1985 he was a Senator.

Is this someone ostrasized for his anti-war views? Hardly. This is someone who started his education in politics, and ended up right where he wanted. I see very little "down time" in his political career at all.


on Aug 25, 2004
As for Kerry's involvement in the antiwar movement when it wasn't popular...

Gene is right...as one who was politically ambitious, I was writing speeches back in junior high as well (won a few awards even), and had designs on being a politician until I realized the real power was BEHIND the politician...hence my campaigning career.

It's also important to note that savvy politicians look for a position that's not widely held but is beginning to hold populist appeal (such as the antiwar movement in 1971)...and latch onto that. It's much easier to make your name than it is to attach yourself to a position that's already popular...sort of a "buy low, sell high" attitude towards politics (again, my campaign experience has taught me this...it's damn near impossible to get on the campaign of a high level entrenched incumbent unless your daddy gave bucks to his campaign; a political aspirant, however, is easy to access...and if they win, they tend to remember the ones who worked hard for their campaign).
on Aug 26, 2004

Sorry to stink up your thread. I'm retiring

you havent.  you didnt.  your comments are both welcomed and appreciated (even when we're at polar opposites) and are never even vaguely perceived as 'steekeeng threads'.   

on Aug 26, 2004

what I want to say about John Kerry and the VVAW ins't really appropriate for this one

yikes more inappropriate than what ive said?

5 PagesFirst 2 3 4 5